Industry News Sponsored by

European Commission’s Experts’ Group Update

In Quest of a Harmonisation: Tilting at Windmills? Report by Myriam Mailly (Technical Officer) and Paul Omar (Technical Research Coordinator) After finishing work on the Preventive Restructuring Directive…

CERIL Report and Statement Published

Initiated and chaired by Prof. Stephan Madaus (Martin Luther University, Germany) and Prof. em. Bob Wessels (Leiden University, the Netherlands), a CERIL Working Party conducted a survey on issues of…

Virtual Law Workshop gathers PhD Researchers from Europe and beyond in Leiden

  From 4 to 5 March 2021, the Stichting (Foundation) Bob Wessels Insolvency Law Collection (BWILC) organised the third edition of the PhD Workshop on European and International Insolvency Law. The…

Virtual Fraud Conference Report

The First Virtual Fraud Conference took place on 2 and 3 February 2021, attracting more than 150 participants from jurisdictions all over the EU. The Fraud Conference was co-organised by R3, the UK Fraud…

News

CERIL Report and Statement Published

Initiated and chaired by Prof. Stephan Madaus (Martin Luther University, Germany) and Prof. em. Bob Wessels (Leiden University, the Netherlands), a CERIL Working Party conducted a survey on issues of international jurisdiction for individual legal cross-border actions that ‘derive directly from public collective insolvency proceedings and are closely linked with them’. To resolve uncertainty on these actions, conveniently called ‘annex actions’, CERIL proposes a concise reference work to classify and distinguish between annex actions and non-annex actions.
 
In summary, the study found three types of annex action:
 
    (a) clear annex actions,
    (b) clear non-annex actions and
    (c) actions with relevant uncertainty about their classification.
 
The Report sets out in detail the categorisation in (a) and (b). Furthermore, the Report gives ample thought to the last category, under (c). This includes (i) actions brought by the insolvency practitioner in relation to the assumption or the termination of executory contracts, (ii) actions brought by an unsecured creditor against the debtor, also referred to as ‘action seeking a declaratory relief’, (iii) actions brought by secured creditors, (iv) actions concerning the return of property held by the debtor, and (v) action brought by the reinstated debtor after the termination of insolvency proceedings.
 
As a consequence, to overcome the existing level of uncertainty with time-consuming and costly disputes in civil proceedings, especially their characterisation as ‘annex action’, CERIL encourages litigators and courts to use the concise reference work as set out in its Report.
 
The CERIL Statement and Report 2020-1 can be downloaded here.
  BENCHMARKS  
Loading Time: Base Classes  0.0034
Controller Execution Time ( News / News Details )  0.0259
Total Execution Time  0.0295
  GET DATA  
No GET data exists
  MEMORY USAGE  
4,876,048 bytes
  POST DATA  
No POST data exists
  URI STRING  
news/details/ceril-report-and-statement-published
  CLASS/METHOD  
news/news_details
  DATABASE:  insoleur_main   QUERIES: 44  (Show)
  HTTP HEADERS  (Show)
  SESSION DATA  (Show)
  CONFIG VARIABLES  (Show)